Page 1 of 1
Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2025 10:50 pm
by CountZero
Trump on Thursday called for an “immediate investigation” into how corrupt D.C. District Court Judge James Boasberg was “randomly” given a fourth Trump-related case.
The judge will now preside over a case examining the recently-leaked Signal group chat where Trump administration officials allegedly allowed The Atlantic’s top editor to see private military information.
“How disgraceful is it that ‘Judge’ James Boasberg has just been given a fourth ‘Trump Case,’ something which is, statistically, IMPOSSIBLE,” the president wrote on Truth Social.
https://gab.com/GENNIE/posts/114236393937681732
It appears the judges are winning this fight so far. How are cases handed out to judges anyway?
Re: Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2025 11:26 pm
by CountZero
Re: Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2025 7:07 am
by Canis Minor
This is all coming to a crescendo. I think President Trump should refuse to obey these obviously political rulings and surround himself with the US military…dare them to try and arrest him! In essence, call their bluff.
Re: Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 8:54 pm
by CountZero
The judge who was ruthless towards J6 protesters is the same one who let Ray Epps walk. Boasberg.
Re: Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2025 7:32 pm
by CountZero
Re: Trump Calls For “Immediate Investigation” Into Corrupt DC Court As TDS Judge Boasberg Given FOURTH Trump Case
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2025 11:05 pm
by SurroundedByLiberals
Simple answer. They're commies and know traitor Roberts (SCOTUS) will likely not intervene,
