Q Is BACK!
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 6:41 am
Jim Watkins, owner of 8kun, verifies that Q has a 'new tripcode' and has dropped 4 new posts. If there are any Qtards here, we have digging to do. https://qalerts.net/
Discussion forum for conservative law abiding patriots
https://lawabidingpatriot.org/
Uh....but last time this Q person was wrong about what was happening. Why listen to him now? Personally, I will roll with Dan Bongino and his sources...much better accuracy rate IMO.Lady wrote:Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:53 am Jim Watkins, owner of 8kun, verifies that Q has a 'new tripcode' and has dropped 4 new posts. If there are any Qtards here, we have digging to do. https://qalerts.net/
I'm glad you asked that, Canis. I'm linking to an article written by Martin Geddes who explains the Q 'thing' very well. The frustrating part has always been 'the when'. When does this all fall into place? When do the drops 'mature' into actual news bits? Having had my nose up Q's drops from the first one, I've learned that you have to do the research first. Find out what the drops reference. The 'when' has always been an issue; many left because we didn't get instant answers with instant fixes. If you read this piece, it all makes sense. All along, we've known a few things - some faction of the military has been involved in this, as well as 'other players'. His drops have had a two- and three-fold layer to them; all are not for us. Some are for the enemy. Consider all the references to Sun Tsu. There has always been a reason. Our job was to research a topic and find out who the 'people of interest' really were. One of my first digs was on 23 and Me. The stuff I uncovered, in just a few links, made me sick and further, scared the hell out of me. What were they (are they) doing with our DNA? And, why? At this point, we can only assume that it doesn't have our best interest as the focus. They were looking for something. What? Who knows. But, bet on it, these vaxs play a role. All things are connected.Canis wrote:Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:55 amUh....but last time this Q person was wrong about what was happening. Why listen to him now? Personally, I will roll with Dan Bongino and his sources...much better accuracy rate IMO.Lady wrote:Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:53 am Jim Watkins, owner of 8kun, verifies that Q has a 'new tripcode' and has dropped 4 new posts. If there are any Qtards here, we have digging to do. https://qalerts.net/
And, this is exactly what you are meant to do! It took some time to prove out that the msm was lying to us. Look at how many various alternative news sites we have now. They are directly competing with msm to tell the Truth. Little factoid: Many of these guys who now have their own 'news outlet' (be it internet, or written on a web site or at a video site) got their start on the Q thread. This is what's so awesome about people learning how to find the real news and report the real news! They got in people's faces, they interviewed the creeps, they stood up and got the news. Do you see any msm going out of their way to report anything Truthful? I haven't. Even Fox has limits to what it will report. The rest are under contract to Lie. (Even though some might be aware they are lying...but, paycheck!) Strong, motivated people who love this country started their own news outlets. Kinda like RSBN. They do news now, too. They started on a shoestring budget to follow Trump's rallys and never missed a one. Survived on donations, and now subscriptions, I think. On Youtube. But, they moved to Rumble, because lefty youtube only let them publish live, and deleted the replay function. So far, Rumble is allowing Free Speech. And, not everyone has 'old timey TV' anymore. Most of us have migrated to the internet just to have one bill a month they can handle. Nothin' on TV I want to watch, I can tell you that! One of the really best news guys to follow is John Solomon. He spent some time on the boards, for sure. And, at the time, nobody knew who he was. Only idiots would identify themselves. Some famous people visited there, too...you would be surprised. It was only a 'workshop'. Dig up the news, find the sources, dig a little deeper, find the dirt. Dig a little more deep and you get your feet dirty, but find out the 'who'. I already know 'who' the players in DC are who have committed those crimes against children. You wouldn't be surprised to know, but that's for later. It's all gonna come out. Those who squeal the loudest are the most guilty. The only hint I'll give you. Somebody always knows somebody who knows what happened because they were there when it went down. Perhaps not the best quality of human being, but disturbed enough by what they saw that they 'talked to someone about it.' A place to watch for in coming days (or months, perhaps) will be the notorious Standard Hotels. And, there are pictures and audios of 'certain people' committing crimes with children; and the pics, even a little blurry, are something you can't unsee. There is a totally unwholesome world out there that, along with drug money, makes more money than the average large business. And yes, it IS a business. Kids are auctioned off on web sites every day. Held in cages until they are delivered to the highest bidder. Nobody in msm talks about that. The alt news did for a while, until the BIG news about how election fraud is committed became the 'center focus' in this country. And while you're at it, read up on the amount of indoctrination kids are getting into becoming 'happy little sex workers' who enjoy being the object of an adult's affection. Or, affliction. Pick one. I think this is just as bad as the trans gender BS they're pulling. And, this was one of MY biggest dives for information. Who, what, and for God's Sake Why? These people are sick. This was often quoted by Q. And, he wasn't kidding. This was an avenue that needed attention, and it has gotten it. Again, State Laws. Are they being enforced? Do they protect children? Why have there been so many arrests (Federally driven, btw) of pedophiles and others who harm children of all ages? And, quite frankly, most of the DCCanis wrote:Thu Jan 01, 1970 10:57 am Ok, if 'Q' was more than one person then it makes sense that the accuracy would vary. However, an anonymous person can say anything they fancy. However, it takes far more cajones to make oneself public and then say things. Personally, I intend to pay attention to those who I've found have a good/accurate track record.